You deployed the controls. Are they still on every device?
You made the investment. The rollout closed at 100%. But the fleet turns over every day, agents fail quietly, and coverage drifts the moment no one is watching. The dashboard still says you are protected. That is the most dangerous number in security: a false sense of coverage.
The gap you cannot see is the one that gets used.
Koopic measures your security control coverage by comparing each control - EDR, MDM enrollment, patch and scanner agents, disk encryption, the web proxy / zero-trust agent, or any tool you connect - against a unified asset inventory built from every source. It surfaces the exact devices missing a control, assigns an owner for each gap, and tracks coverage to a healthy state, so security leaders can prove coverage instead of assuming it.
A laptop is re-imaged after a hardware fault. IT restores it and ships it back the same day. The EDR agent never goes back on - not on purpose, just missed in the rush. The device shows up in the directory, in MDM, in the asset list. By every list you check, it looks normal.
Three weeks later that one machine clicks the wrong link. There is no EDR to catch the execution, no web-proxy agent to block the callback. The thing your whole program was built to stop runs unopposed - on the one box that quietly fell out of coverage.
Your dashboard said 100%. Reality was 99.4%. The breach started in the 0.6% nobody could see.
Coverage does not fail loudly. It drifts.
A control deployment is a project with an end date. Coverage is a living number that moves every single day after that date - usually down, and usually in silence.
The fleet churns every day
New hires, hardware refreshes, re-images, decommissions, BYOD. Every change is a chance for a device to come online without a control - or to drop one and never get it back.
Agents fail silently
An agent gets uninstalled during troubleshooting, crashes after an OS update, or simply stops checking in. Nothing alerts you. The device still shows up in your other tools, so it looks fine.
No single owner of the gap
One team deploys the tools, another manages the endpoints, another runs the program. The gap belongs to everyone and no one - so it sits.
You measured at rollout, not today
Coverage was "100%" the day the project closed. That number is a snapshot, not a live signal - and it has been drifting ever since.
Is the zero-trust agent actually everywhere?
Zero trust only works if the web-proxy / SSE agent is on every device - the one machine without it routes around your entire policy. Koopic treats the proxy agent as a coverage signal like any other: present, missing, or stale, on every device in your inventory. EDR, MDM, patch agents, disk encryption - same idea, one view.
- See the named devices missing each control, not just a percentage
- Catch stale agents that check the box but stopped reporting
- Watch coverage trend toward a healthy state instead of guessing
Coverage you can prove. An owner for every gap.
Visibility is step one. Closing the gap - and keeping it closed - is an accountability problem. Koopic supports both ways of running it.
One coverage dashboard and a plan
When the security or digital team owns deployment, lead with a single live coverage view and a remediation plan: what is uncovered, what is being fixed, and a trend line moving toward a healthy state you can take to leadership.
A scorecard per team or business unit
When ownership is distributed, give each team or business unit a scorecard for its own devices. Everyone can see where they stand, the gap has a name next to it, and coverage stops being someone else's problem.
No new agent. It reads the tools you already run.
Unify
Koopic connects to your EDR, MDM, scanners, cloud, directory and on-prem sources and merges them into one deduplicated record per device - the trustworthy denominator for coverage.
Compare
Each device is checked against every control's own feed. In the inventory but missing from a control - or present but stale - is a gap, including the devices no single tool would report.
Assign & track
Put an owner on every gap, centrally or per team, and watch coverage trend toward a healthy state over time. Coverage you can prove, not assume.
Security control coverage FAQ
How does Koopic know a device is missing a control?
Which controls can you track coverage for?
Is this the same as my EDR console showing me its agents?
Who gets held accountable for the gaps?
Do I have to replace any of my tools?
Find out what your real coverage is
We will connect a sample of your data and show you, on your own fleet, exactly where your controls are - and where they are not.